Medical Reviewer Needed — TRT Health Content Website (Ongoing)
We’re launching a health content website on a premium .med domain covering testosterone replacement therapy including clinical guides, treatment overviews, side effect profiles, and monitoring protocols.
We need a US-licensed healthcare professional to review 5 articles for medical accuracy. This is a paid test batch. If the review quality is strong, there are 28 additional articles in the pipeline across two follow-up contracts ($750–$1,500 in additional work).
This is not ghostwriting. The content is written. You are reviewing for:
∙ Factual accuracy of clinical claims (dosing, mechanisms, contraindications)
∙ Appropriate safety language and disclaimers
∙ Outdated or misleading information
∙ Missing context that a clinician would flag for a patient-facing resource
The 5 test articles cover:
1. Side Effects and Risks of TRT
2. Fertility and TRT
3. Blood Pressure and Cardiovascular Considerations
4. When TRT May Not Be Right for You
5. Labs and Monitoring
These are the most clinically dense articles in the library. We’re starting here intentionally so we can evaluate your thoroughness on the content that matters most.
Attribution: You will be credited by name, credentials, and headshot on every article you review. This is published attribution on a .med domain with professional editorial standards and your name is attached to the work publicly.
Requirements:
∙ Active, unrestricted US clinical license (MD, DO, NP, or PA)
∙ Endocrinology, urology, or men’s health experience strongly preferred
∙ Comfortable reviewing content about TRT protocols, telehealth prescribing models, lab monitoring, side effects, cardiovascular risk, and fertility implications
∙ Willing to provide NPI number for license verification
Deliverable: Google Doc comments on each article flagging inaccuracies, outdated claims, missing safety language, or misleading framing. We don’t need rewrites, just flags and suggested corrections. If something is accurate, a brief “confirmed” note is helpful.
Timeline: 5–7 days from article delivery.
What to include in your proposal:
1. Your clinical license type and specialty
2. Your NPI number (we verify
and this is non-negotiable for a health content site)
3. Any experience reviewing health content for publication (not required but helpful)
4. Your availability in the next 2 weeks
We respond to every proposal. If you’re a good fit, we move fast.
Apply Now
Apply Now
We need a US-licensed healthcare professional to review 5 articles for medical accuracy. This is a paid test batch. If the review quality is strong, there are 28 additional articles in the pipeline across two follow-up contracts ($750–$1,500 in additional work).
This is not ghostwriting. The content is written. You are reviewing for:
∙ Factual accuracy of clinical claims (dosing, mechanisms, contraindications)
∙ Appropriate safety language and disclaimers
∙ Outdated or misleading information
∙ Missing context that a clinician would flag for a patient-facing resource
The 5 test articles cover:
1. Side Effects and Risks of TRT
2. Fertility and TRT
3. Blood Pressure and Cardiovascular Considerations
4. When TRT May Not Be Right for You
5. Labs and Monitoring
These are the most clinically dense articles in the library. We’re starting here intentionally so we can evaluate your thoroughness on the content that matters most.
Attribution: You will be credited by name, credentials, and headshot on every article you review. This is published attribution on a .med domain with professional editorial standards and your name is attached to the work publicly.
Requirements:
∙ Active, unrestricted US clinical license (MD, DO, NP, or PA)
∙ Endocrinology, urology, or men’s health experience strongly preferred
∙ Comfortable reviewing content about TRT protocols, telehealth prescribing models, lab monitoring, side effects, cardiovascular risk, and fertility implications
∙ Willing to provide NPI number for license verification
Deliverable: Google Doc comments on each article flagging inaccuracies, outdated claims, missing safety language, or misleading framing. We don’t need rewrites, just flags and suggested corrections. If something is accurate, a brief “confirmed” note is helpful.
Timeline: 5–7 days from article delivery.
What to include in your proposal:
1. Your clinical license type and specialty
2. Your NPI number (we verify
and this is non-negotiable for a health content site)
3. Any experience reviewing health content for publication (not required but helpful)
4. Your availability in the next 2 weeks
We respond to every proposal. If you’re a good fit, we move fast.
Apply Now
Apply Now